Your landlord kept your money but never explained why. Texas law has a powerful remedy: they forfeit the right to withhold ANY amount.
Very Strong
Case strength
Yes
Forfeiture rule
Full deposit
Recovery potential
§ 92.104
Itemization required
The Case
Texas law is unambiguous: If a landlord withholds any portion of your deposit but fails to provide an itemized list of deductions, the landlord forfeits the right to withhold ANY portion.
This is not a penalty. It's a forfeiture. The landlord loses the money entirely. You get it all back.
Key advantage: You don't have to prove the deductions were unreasonable. You don't have to prove bad faith. The lack of itemization alone is enough.
Law
Calculator
For no itemization, you recover: full deposit + $100 + 3× + filing costs (if you file in court).
This is an estimate for planning purposes. Consult Texas Property Code or an attorney for your specific situation.
Real-World
Landlord kept $800 of $1,200 deposit. Renter received nothing — no itemization, no explanation, no communication.
Verdict: Forfeiture. Landlord loses right to withhold any amount. Renter recovers $1,200 + $100 + $2,400 = $3,700.
Landlord returned $600 but included a vague note: 'Damages: $600.' No itemized breakdown of what the $600 was for.
Verdict: Insufficient itemization. Forfeiture applies. Renter recovers $600 + $100 + $1,800 = $2,500.
Landlord withheld $500 and provided a detailed itemized list: '$200 carpet cleaning, $150 paint touch-up, $150 cleaning.' Sent within 30 days.
Verdict: Proper itemization. Forfeiture does NOT apply. Renter can dispute the individual charges, but landlord's itemization was compliant.
Landlord withheld $1,000 and provided itemization for $600 (carpet) but no explanation for the remaining $400.
Verdict: Incomplete itemization. Likely forfeiture on the $400 that wasn't itemized. Renter recovers at least $400 + penalties.
Odds
FAQ
Content Integrity
DepositRights provides legal information and self-help tools, not legal advice. This page does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Primary Statutes